The panel's chairman, a former government architect,
Chris Johnson, who works for Mr Sartor, was accused of running a "token
meeting" that was misleading and insulting because he could not provide
details of Foster's plans.
He was questioned about the potential density of the
development because locals are convinced Foster's will be allowed a much
higher density than the City of Sydney Council was prepared to accept when
it was negotiating with the company.
A scoping paper submitted by Foster's shows that it wants
to develop 260,000 square metres of floor space, including 1800 apartments.
Professor Johnson said the panel had not concluded what
the density should be, although it had asked Foster's to prepare the images
that showed the maximum building height.
"We thought it was best to start with the maximum [height]
and work back," he told the meeting.
"It [the tallest tower] wouldn't be as ugly [as the UTS
tower]. It would be hard for us to do that … the question is whether this
eyesore is helped by some neighbourly support."
A spokeswoman for the Chippendale community, Jeanette
Brokman, said the images showed a mini-Manhattan overshadowing a heritage
village.
"That makes you think you are going to get Greenwich
Village. This is more about mini-Manhattan on steroids. This is the ugly
side of New York," she said.
Locals also questioned the planning process, under which
Professor Johnson will submit his panel's report to Mr Sartor by the end of
this month, before Foster's lodges its plan for the 5.8-hectare site. It is
unclear if the panel's advice will ever be made public, although the
Foster's plans will go on public exhibition.
A City of Sydney councilor, John McInerney, said the
process ignored two years of work by the council and the Central Sydney
Planning Committee.
"We are now being presented with what Foster's really
wants, what they need to make enough profit for themselves," Cr McInerney
said